To review how compulsory education the USA has met parent’s expectation.To tell the readers that formal school in the USA have been constatly developed for a long time.To remind American parents that the formal school is basically a product of culture.To discuss if the American school system is truly effective to educate children.The unfortunate fact is that one of our most cherished instituations is, by its very nature, failing our children and our society (fakta yang sangat disayangkan adalah bahwa salah satu institusi kita yang paling berharga, pada dasarnya mengecewakan anak-anak dan masyarakat kita).ĭari dua kalimat di atas dapat diketahui bahwa topik pada teks tersebut adalah Doubts on the effectiveness of America school systems (keraguan terhadap efektivitas sistem sekolah Amerika).Many parents to do have qualms about how well schools are performing (banyak orang tua yang memiliki keraguan tentang seberapa baik kinerja sekolah).Absence of a research –based school system in the USA.Regulations for American children to stay longer at schools.Restrictions on children’s freedom at the US school.Doubts on the effectiveness of America school systems.Parent’s expectation on reformation in American school system.(Adapted from: -school-system-damaging-kids/#ixzz39fiE0qrJ)
It’s no wonder that many of the world’s greatest entrepreneurs and innovators either left school early (like Thomas Edison) or said they hated school and learned despite it, not because of it (like Albert Enstein). The top-down, teach-and-test method, in which learning is motivated by a system of rewards and punishments rather than by curiosity or by any real desire to know, is well designed for indoctrination and obidience training but not much else. Subsequent attempts at reform have failed because they haven’t altered the basic blueprint. When schools were taken to over by the state, made compulsory, and directed toward secular ends, the basic structure and methods of teaching remained unchanged. The blueprint for them was developed during the Protestant Reformation, when schools were created to teach children to read the bible, to believe Scripture without questioning it, and to obey authority figures without questioning them. School as we know them today are a product of history, not of research.
But nothing could be further from the truth. Most people assume that the basic design of today’s schools emerged from scientific evidence about how children learn. President Obama and Secretary of education Arne Duncan are so enamored of it that they want even longer school days and years. And as scientists have investigated how children naturally learn, they’ve realized that kids do so most deeply and fully, and with greatest enthusiasm, in conditions that are almost opposite to those of school.Ĭompulsory education has been a fixture for our culture now for severalgenerations. In recent decades, we’ve been compelling them to spend even more time in this kind of setting, and there’s strong evidence that this is causing psychological damage to many of them. But what if the real problem is school itself? The unfortunate fact is that one of our most cherished instituations is, by its very nature, failing our children and our society.Ĭhildren are required to be in school, where their freedom is greatly restricted, far more than most adults would tolerate in their workplaces. Many parents to do have qualms about how well schools are performing, but the conventional wisdom is that these issues can be resolved with more money, better teachers, more challenging curricula, or more rigorous tests. Parents send their children to school with the best of intentions, believing that formal education is what kids need to become productive, happy adults. Questions 1-3 are based on the following the text